• Highlights from ESMO 2023
  • Podcast Series: Discussions on NCCN Guidelines for MCL and CLL
  • Podcast Series: Discussions on CLL
  • And the Diagnosis is…
  • Highlights from ASCO 2024: Focus On Endometrial Cancer
  • Cancer Patient Resource Center
  • Patient-Matched Tumor-Normal Sequencing

Advanced Search

  • Featured:
  • Case Study: How Would You Treat…
  • HRD Testing in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
  • Genomic Profiling in Advanced Cancer Therapy Selection
  • Transforming colorectal cancer management with tumor informed ctDNA testing

Fulvestrant + Abemaciclib Shows Promising Activity in Endometrial Cancer

June 1, 2024

Back to Highlights from ASCO 2024 – Focus On Endometrial Cancer

By Catlin Nalley

Phase II data demonstrated durable responses among patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who underwent treatment with a combination of abemaciclib and fulvestrant. These findings were recently presented by Angela Green, MD, Gynecologic Oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, during the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting (Abstract 5511).

“Inhibition of the cyclin D-Cyclin dependent kinase (CDK)4/6-INK4-retinoblastoma pathway can overcome acquired or de novo treatment resistance to endocrine monotherapy,” according to Green and colleagues. “Elevated CDK4 expression is observed in 34-77 percent of endometrioid endometrial cancers and is an early event of neoplastic transformation.

“Responses to endocrine monotherapy in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer are suboptimal and short-lived,” they continued. “We hypothesized that CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib combined with fulvestrant is a promising strategy to improve outcomes with endocrine therapy in patients with advanced or recurrent hormone receptor-positive endometrial cancer.”

 

Research Specifics

In this investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, Phase II study, eligible patients included adults (≥18 years) with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Other eligibility criteria were estrogen receptor or progesterone receptor expression ≥ 1 percent by immunohistochemistry, measurable disease, no more than two prior lines of chemotherapy, and no more than one prior line of hormonal therapy. All histologies could be included except carcinosarcoma, according to the study authors who noted that mixed histologies required ≥95 percent endometrioid component.

“Patients received fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly monthly with an initial 2-week loading dose and abemaciclib 150 mg orally twice daily until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity,” Green and team outlined. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1.

As of the data cutoff of October 7, 2023, 27 patients initiated protocol therapy and 25 were evaluated for efficacy, according to the study abstract. Twenty-four (89%) had tumors with endometrioid histology, nine patients (33%) had prior hormonal therapy, and 26 patients (96%) had at least one prior line of chemotherapy, the study authors reported.

“Eleven patients achieved a partial response resulting in an objective response rate of 44 percent (90% CI: 27.0% to 62.1%),” Green and colleagues stated. “The median duration of response, among patients that experienced a response, was 15.6 months (90% CI, 7.2-nonestimable [NE]).

“All responses were in Grade 1 or 2 endometrioid endometrial cancers,” they explained. “Ten out of 11 responses (91%) were in patients with copy number low/no specific molecular profile endometrial cancers, while one response (9%) was in a patient with microsatellite instability-high endometrial cancer. The median progression-free survival was 9 months (90% CI: 1.8 to 20.4) and median overall survival was 37.8 months (90% CI: 16.3 to NE).”

In terms of safety, the most common Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (22%) and anemia (19%).

In conclusion, this Phase II study of fulvestrant plus abemaciclib in hormone receptor-positive advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer showed that this therapeutic approach has promising activity, leading to durable responses in the study population. Further analysis is planned in a Phase III clinical trial.

 

Catlin Nalley is a contributing writer.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy

Wolter Kluwer

Your Privacy

To give you the best possible experience we use cookies and similar technologies. We use data collected through these technologies for various purposes, including to enhance website functionality, remember your preferences, show the most relevant content, and show the most useful ads. You can select your preferences by clicking the link. For more information, please review our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

|
|

Cookie Policy

Information about our use of cookies

Wolters Kluwer ("we" or "us") wants to inform you about the ways we process your personal information. In this Privacy & Cookie Notice we explain what personal information we collect, use and disclose.

Personal information means any data relating to an individual who can be identified, directly or indirectly, based on that information. This may include information such as names, contact details, (online) identification data, online identifiers, or other characteristics specific to that individual.

Read More